fedify (@fedify@hollo.social)
Introducing #BotKit: A #TypeScript framework for creating truly standalone #ActivityPub bots!
Unlike traditional Mastodon bots, BotKit lets you build fully independent #fediverse bots that aren't constrained by platform limits. Create your entire bot in a single TypeScript file using our simple, expressive API.
Currently #Deno-only, with Node.js & Bun support planned. Built on the robust #Fedify foundation.
Show Original Post
post (@post@community.nodebb.org)
There have been some reports (@bh4-tech I believe?) that NodeBB does not successfully federate with Threads. Looking into the issue, I discovered that it is only this domain community.nodebb.org that is unable to get/send activites with Threads.net.
After some help from @erincandescent@akko.erincandescent.net @jaz@mastodon.iftas.org and @grishka@friends.grishka.me, I have discovered that our domain has been blocked by Threads for not serving up a public feed.
This is the feed they're specifically looking for. If your application does not serve it, it will be automatically blocked at some point. There is an appeal form you can fill out so your server can be re-instated.
- At this time, Threads seems to see the lack of the public feed as a non-starter for AP federation.
- As an AP software implementor, in order for admins running NodeBB to not have their servers auto-blocked, I will have to implement this API
- Threads relying on the existence of a Mastodon-specific API suggests that they're federating with Mastodon only (perhaps as part of a limited experiment), or that it is an oversight that needs to be fixed on their end with time.
Therefore if you wish for your NodeBB to federate with Threads, my guidance at this time is to whitelist your domain with Threads directly by filling out the form.
Show Original Post
chrisamoody (@chrisamoody@zirk.us)
Is there anything similar. to diaspora but takes. advantages. of #activitypub ?
Show Original Post
elgg (@elgg@indieweb.social)
In a little while, we'll be ready to introduce a plugin for integrating #ActivityPub into #Elgg.
On the video: a feature to find #Fediverse activities and actors from an Elgg instance.
Show Original Post
nekoprogram (@nekoprogram@tkz.one)
Resulta que estaba viendo un vídeo de YouTube en el que explicaban Mastodon, (Cosas del algoritmo y el clickbait, no he podido no hacer click).
Bajo a los comentarios y lo segundo que leo
cito textualmente:
" ¡Falso! La censura en Mastodon es peor que en las redes sociales convencionales. Me suspendieron definitivamente mi cuenta. Ni en Facebook nunca me han suspendido una cuenta por una publicación polémica. Alegué que no tenían pruebas verificables de lo que me acusaban, pero no les importó que yo tuviera la razón. "
Le iba a contestar pero visto que ha pasado un año para que molestarme, estará en Facebook/Twitter...
#Mastodon #youtube #descentralizacion #redessociales #activitypub #moderacion #centralizacion
Show Original Post
muxed (@muxed@masto.es)
He estado buscando una versión para el Fediverso de Letterboxd, solo he encontrado lo que creo que es un fork de Bookwyrm y otro proyecto que no se toca hace varios años.
Alguien conoce una alternativa o me planteo aprender como hacer algo por el estilo. Ya he buscado por la internet. Se agradece difusión.
#activitypub #fediverse #Bookwyrm #moviewyrm
Show Original Post
trwnh (@trwnh@mastodon.social)
#activitypub thonk: delivering to a Collection is nonsensical because a Collection could be an actor. but so can a Group
basically you have implicit behavior "the Collection needs to be expanded to its items which are assumed to all be actors" just like a Group might expand to all its members (except the assumption there is a bit stronger, you can generally expect a Group's members to all be individuals?)
whereas something like WAC makes a distinction between agent, agentGroup, agentClass
Show Original Post
lps (@lps@mograph.social)
If you prefer a more #instagram presentation when following #photography or #art accounts, it's easy!
Create a #pixelfed account like you did for #mastodon https://pixelfed.org/servers
Then, if you find an artist that you want to follow from there, due to the nicer layout for that type of content, just copy and paste their account
ex. @nicetriangle into the search bar and voila ... you're following from there (where you can also comment)
#mastoart #fediverse #activitypub
Show Original Post
notes (@notes@bofh.social)
#Meta might want to think about implementing the #AtProto instead of #ActivityPub for #Threads. I have a feeling that #ActivityPub isn't going to be of much use to them now.
Show Original Post
sl007 (@sl007@digitalcourage.social)
Todays #ActivityPub #geosocial TaskForce meeting was fun, here are some preliminary notes:
https://hedgedoc.socialweb.coop/s/D7yKLjJQs#
et.al
please attend the upcoming events https://www.w3.org/groups/cg/socialcg/calendar/
Show Original Post
chris (@chris@mstdn.chrisalemany.ca)
@aral ok, devil's advocate here. Please hear me out.
I personally don't use any Meta product anymore for all the reasons mentioned and more. However, I administer two instances now. Both federating with Threads.
We are here in the #Fediverse, and can see other servers thanks to the #ActivityPub standard.
I also own many domains and run at least a dozen websites running on HTTP standards of course.
There are *a lot* of illegal websites out there. There are even more websites with questionable content including, twitter, facebook, instagram, but also stuff like porn sites, hate sites, nazi sites, spambots, all the rest.
But are my websites compromised by simply existing on the same network without explicit action from day one? Is CBC.ca a lesser organization because it is on the same Internet as pornhub.com and doesn't actively block content from that domain until something actually occurs?
This is how the world wide web has always worked, so why would the open social web be any different?
So bringing this back to Threads (and eventually Bluesky as I think it'll end up in the same place)…. is a Fediverse instance automatically lesser because it exists on the same network as Threads and doesn't actively block content from them until there is cause to do so?
I see maybe 4 or 5 posts from people on Threads in a day on my personal feed. I thought at first that Threads content might overwhelm my public feeds on my server, but it hasn't. What I have seen is not abusive or problematic in any way, it's just normal content.
If at some point the posts emanating from Threads is so overwhelmed with problematic content that it impacts the well being of users on my servers, then of course it would be my responsibility to take action, from banning to outright domain block.
But today? Zuck’s change of policy has had zero impact and there remains good content from people on Threads.
Show Original Post
notes (@notes@social.iamforum.space)
Threads.net is de-federated on this #activitypub #sharkey server. Reason: Mark.
Show Original Post