git

Back Open Paginator
04.04.2024 10:47
rrwo (@rrwo@floss.social)

I'm getting "Segmentation fault (core dumped)" errors from #git when using `git add -p`

How is your morning going?




Show Original Post


04.04.2024 10:29
berkes (@berkes@mastodon.nl)

Another 23 minutes of "TIL🤯 why did I only learn this now"

So You Think You Know #Git Part 2 - by Scott Chacon.
youtube.com/watch?v=Md44rcw13k




Show Original Post


04.04.2024 09:02
macberg (@macberg@mastodon.online)

#Obsidian users, what's the benefits (and drawbacks) of using #git instead of #SyncThing?




Show Original Post


04.04.2024 08:32
kernellogger (@kernellogger@fosstodon.org)

/me wonders why #Git supports

$ git remote set-branches remote_bar --add branch_foo

but not an equivalent like

$ git remote set-branches remote_bar --remove branch_foo

/me assumes the answer is the usual "nobody cared enough to implement it yet"

/me goes an removes the relevant line from .git/config manually




Show Original Post


04.04.2024 05:49
todd_a_jacobs (@todd_a_jacobs@infosec.exchange)

I deeply respect @briankrebs, but in this case I think the data he's presenting is fundamentally invalid. A little-known fact about #Git history is that #timestamps are both definable and mutable. While you might be able to make statements about when a Git commit was pushed to a server using the server-side SSH or HTTP logs, the fact that you can set GIT_AUTHOR_DATE and GIT_COMMITTER_DATE as environment variables means you can't rely on commit timestamps alone for this type of analysis.

This is a feature of Git since the ability to squash or rewrite its mutable history is a key differentiator compared to #FossilSCM or other #SCMs that treat history as immutable(ish). For example, allowing one to do things like report a commit as the time a patch or source document was originally written rather than just noting when it was committed or merged can be very useful in accurately representing the real-world evolution of data created outside the repository.

This is not a flaw in Git. Anyone savvy enough to craft the #xz attack could just as easily have adjusted their system clocks instead, leading to fraudulent timestamps in the commit history anyway.

Forensically, you'd need to look at the timestamps from NTP-backed server or router logs, not just the Git history. All Git clients are technically "offline" until they push one or more commits to a remote, so there's really no way to validate client-side SCM timestamps. This is also true of email headers, filesystem attributes, and any other data that relies on real system clocks or user-defined timestamps, so you'd need more points of correlation than are provided here.

linkedin.com/posts/bkrebs_one-




Show Original Post


04.04.2024 03:11
TeXUsersGroup (@TeXUsersGroup@techhub.social)

From #CTAN:

Erik Nijenhuis submitted an update to the gitinfo-lua package.

Version: 1.0.3
License: lppl1.3c

Summary description: Display git project information in your LaTeX projects

ctan.org/pkg/gitinfo-lua

#TeXLaTeX #git




Show Original Post


03.04.2024 23:25
soupglasses (@soupglasses@hachyderm.io)

If you found a #Git repository you like, which forges would you give the equivalent of a star on?

(Please retoot :blobfoxheartcute:)

Star on GitHub
Star on GitLab
Star on CodeBerg
I don't star at all




Show Original Post


03.04.2024 19:58
epompeii (@epompeii@mastodon.social)

🐰 Bencher v0.4.5 Released! 🎉

Important Update: Bencher can now track rebases and base/target branch changes!

See the updated and expanded branch selection docs for more details on how to upgrade your setup: bencher.dev/docs/explanation/b




Show Original Post


03.04.2024 19:50
mmarif (@mmarif@mastodon.social)

GitNex 5.4.0 is out with import/export app data and more:

- Delete email from account
- Update profile settings
- Add SSH key to account

Read release notes for more: codeberg.org/gitnex/GitNex/rel

Release post on: najigram.com/category/gitnex




Show Original Post


03.04.2024 18:15
lemor (@lemor@mastodon.social)

chezmoi.io/

A convenient way to manage your dots through git




Show Original Post


03.04.2024 15:54
parpok (@parpok@101010.pl)

nie rozumiem o co chodzi z tym "Projects that value your Privacy" i gitea jako "Mostly"

forgejo.org/compare/

bo jedyne co widzę to to że "my z forgejo jesteśmy FOSS non profit więc jesteśmy lepsi od tych otwartych z planami dla enterprise czy zamkniętymi"

#FOSS #Gitea #Forgejo #Privacy #git




Show Original Post


03.04.2024 15:11
pesche (@pesche@mastodon.green)

Ever committed to your #git repo with the wrong email address, because you have different addresses for corporate and open source work?

@alexandre has you covered, using #includeIf in your git config : blog.touret.info/2024/04/02/gi

#TechAtWorldline




Show Original Post


1 ...24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 ...42
UP